Eternity is sometimes said to point to an existence outside of time. That’s an idea I think is true and worth attempting to explain with an illustration.
I used to think of eternity as a very, very long extension of time. If the span of my life were like a toothpick, then eternity would be the distance to some galaxy billions of light years away. Eternity is so much longer that, proportionately, the years of my life are only like a razor scratch on a stretch of rock—representing eternity—that goes to the horizon.
This image helped me appreciate the religious law about being good in return for eternal happiness: I might need to give up certain fun vices now in return for a much longer period of pleasure later.
But although the toothpick and scratch-on-the-surface metaphors kind of work, they are false. Eternity is different than a longer measure.
To flesh out the metaphor a little more accurately, I’m going to use an idea inspired by my friend Douglas Ell’s book, Counting To God— which I recommend to everyone, by the way.1
Doug uses the concept of “infinity” because his argument has a lot to do with math, but it’s a direct parallel. He points out that if you had a measuring gauge like a speedometer with a 0 on the left side and infinity on the right, and begin with the pointer on 0, it doesn’t matter what “intermediary” number you try to measure, the pointer would never leave 0. Try 2, it does not budge. Try the largest number you can possibly imagine, still the gauge stays put. No number gets you proportionately closer to infinity.
The span of my years is indeed like a scratch on the surface of eternity. But what is the proportional relationship of that distant galaxy, billions of light years away? To gauge it we’d have to pull back far enough to get the three spans into the frame: my years of life, the billions of light years, and eternity.
We’re therefore in a space ship above the rock formation, pulling back to get the three spans into view, and at first, the massively wide mark of the billions of light years certainly dwarfs the mark made by my years. Let’s assume both are painted with a day-glow paint that can be seen from quite far away. But the rock of eternity extends beyond Earth, beyond the solar system, galaxy, and entire universe. To see the true proportions we need to get all three into the frame. But even pulling backward at the speed of light, forever, we would never pull back far enough to see the entire rock that is eternity.
In the process, however, we’d get to a point where the scratch made by the toothpick-length of my life, and the mark made by the billions of light years, would appear identical impressions on the rock. If we could ever see the true proportions, the second one would be no wider than the first. And if we multiplied the distance to that galaxy by a trillion, represented as a proportion of eternity, it would still be no more than a razor scratch, and then if we multiplied that number again by a trillion trillion and pulled back to try to get it all into the frame, eventually that largest number still would make nothing more than the thinnest scratch.
When we see that no length of time can make a larger mark on eternity, we begin to understand what “outside of time” means.
We might suppose that if a thing were eternal, whatever substance it might be, it would not merely have a longer existence than we have in time, but it would have a different quality of existence. In The Great Divorce, C.S. Lewis depicts Eternity (and referring to Lewis’ usage we do need to capitalize the word) as a place where everything is much more solid.2 A regular human, visiting, would be a translucent wraith who couldn’t even dent a blade of the grass in Eternity.
We can’t know for sure. Imagining the scale and different reality of the eternal, however, it seems plausible that being “in” eternity, relative to being in time, puts one not only in a place of post-existence, but in a place of permanence.
Picturing in our thoughts that infinite expanse of rock-like, transcendent fixture, several ideas about it might come to mind:
- It’s a permanent existence separate from the passing stages we perceive.
- It’s both future and past…. but also contemporary.
- It’s both elsewhere and here.
But wouldn’t we have some knowledge of this permanent, more real, reality? It doesn’t seem beyond the realm of possibility that this massive edifice of eternity might be somehow perceptible to us. If it’s real, it ought to have some impact on us, here in this ephemeral place within time.
I think it does, and the glimpses we have of eternity underlie our experience of life.